Whereas the former component concerns the minimum requirements an. Causation in the law jn spite of all the work that has been done on the subject of causation 1 there are questions about the concept of cause that have been little discussed. In the first place, the harm for which compensation is to be paid in the law of contract is usually economic rather than physical, and establishing causal connection between a breach of contract and economic loss. Session 1 hart and honore, selections from causation in the law. Causation in the law stanford encyclopedia of philosophy. Hart honore causation in the law pdf causation in the law. This text is an updated and extended second edition supporting the findings of its. How do questions of causal responsibility bear on questions of legal responsibility.
Causation is widely regarded as presenting very difficult issues for criminal law. Causation in insurance contract law also comes with a foreword written by professor robert merkin. Closely reasoned, with full reference to the literature and a considerable treatment of continental theories, it represents a serious attempt to restate the law in tort, contract and crime in an intelligible way. However, causation problems can occur whenever criminal liability requires a specific outcome. It is perhaps unsurprising then that causation in tort law has been subject to rigorous analysis over the years by legal commentators4 and the courts. Causation in criminal law abstract despite difficulties associated with the law of causation, it could be much clearer than it is. Sthe concept of causation asit is foundin legaldiscourse. Causation and causality have been debated for centuries in philosophy, and there are thousands of books and articles on the topic, including some very recent. Due to its scope and depth, moores causation and responsibility is probably the most important publication in the philosophy of law since the publication of harts and honores causation in the law in 1959. Causation and responsibility excerpt from causation in the law, hart and. The starting point of the first edition of this work published in 1959 was the claim that courts in determining legal responsibility employ commonsense notions of causation. It made explicit what these notions were, and how they are related to the causal theories of mill and hume on the one hand, and to the actual decisions of courts and the arguments of legal theorists on the other.
In moral case, we make judgments of responsibility to assign praise and blame, to. Session 1 hart and honore, selections from causation in. Of all published articles, the following were the most read within the past 12 months. Oct 24, 2017 for similar reasons, although i will be drawing on harts insights about the justificatory significance of a persons having the opportunity to choose what will happen in a situation, i have no stakes in defending harts quite different account of causation in tort law, as laid out in his seminal work with tony honore. Secondly, even if the criteria suggested for selecting caudation conditions as causes are in place in explanatory inquiries they are not necessarily so in attributing responsibility.
The aim of this paper is to present a framework which provides an acceptable explanation of, and justification for, the pattern of the cases and the statutory provisions. Including the but for test of factual causation and legal causation. The third of these alternatives, which has roots in hart and honores 1985 treatment of causation in the law, treats causation as relative to default states, which encode the states that are considered normal and natural, as opposed to the deviant states. An individual user may print out a pdf of a single chapter of a monograph in oso for personal use. A member of the ness set is a causally relevant condition. Beginning with a series of articles in the 1950s and culminating in their massive book of 1959, causation in the law, second edition 1985, herbert hart and tony honore sought to describe the idea of intervening causation that they saw the law adopting from everyday causal idioms. In causation in the law 1959, hebert hart and tony honore attempted to set forth a set of allegedly causal principles, supposedly deeply embedded in ordinary thought, for identifying causes and attributing legal responsibility. Recently in england, however, an attempt was made to reduce causation to a problem of responsibility. Causation and opportunity in tort oxford journal of. This volume offers, for the first time, a detailed exchange between legal and philosophical scholars over moores most recent work. An overview of the law relating to causation in criminal liability. Download pdf causation in the law free usakochan pdf. This text is an updated and extended second edition supporting the findings of its wellknown.
I believe that it was generated by harts attempt, in both causation in the law and his writings on legal positivism, to defend law and legal reasoning against the. Causation problems and considerations in the criminal law. Causation in law is an example of the actus reus which is the active element in a crime. From selected data of causal usage, hart and honore extracted what they called.
Philosophers have argued ad nausea about the law of universal causation. One can see their concept most easily in three steps. Causation in the law and millions of other books are available for amazon kindle. Humphhies mount allisonuniversity general causation in the law. According to the dominant paradigm articulated most notably by professors h. Obviously, a great many cases at law involve such transactions between plaintiff and defendant, but i cannot take the space here to discuss harts and honores. What the law of causation needs to be if it is to serve the values constituting the function of the rules in which causation appears, thus makes a considerable difference to what the law of causation is. Hart and honore are unable to provide a sound philosophical basis for the criminal law of causation in their causation in the law, and that another, more critical, analysis is required to explain, if not to rationalise, the vagaries of the law in this area. University of missouri school of law scholarship repository faculty publications fall 1992 causation in fact in omission cases. This chapter maintains that there is no satisfactory analysis of causation in non causal terms in the huge philosophical literature on the topic.
Introduction the legal maxim take your victim as you find him 228 is wellknown in both english criminal and tort law, as well as in many other legal systems. Hart and tony honore causation comprises two components. Discussions of causation are much less prominent in books about contract than in books about tort. As we proceed to describe what the laws concept of causation is. Use the link below to share a fulltext version of this article with your friends and colleagues.
The early chapters deal philosophically with the concept of cause and are clearly the work of hart, while later chapters deal with individual cases in. As we proceed to describe what the laws concept of causation is, we should be eclectic on what these values are. All readings will be on sakai, but it is recommended that you purchase hart and honores. Hart and tony honore argue that causation in the law is based on causation outside the law, that the causal principles the courts rely on to determine legal responsibility are based on distinctions exercised in ordinary causal judgments. Someone commits a criminal action, which is the cause of a crime. Pdf causation in the law download full pdf book download. This new edition of the seminal 1959 work retains the original analysis of commonsense causal concepts, and includes hundreds of new decisions and a substantial preface in which criticisms are met and a rationale propounded for commonsense causal notions as an element in legal responsibility. Causation plays a central role in the law, from assessing criminal responsibility for outcomes to apportioning damages to victims.
The metaphysics of causation stanford encyclopedia of. Causality and causation in law scandinavian studies in law. In most conventional criminal law cases, causation is a straightforward matter. Hart honore causation in the law pdf causation in the. It will be of interestto historians becauseof the many illuminatingparallelsit drawsbetween the linguistic conventions of historyandthe law. Hart, was a british legal philosopher, and a major figure in political and legal philosophy. Unlimited viewing of the articlechapter pdf and any associated supplements and figures. For them, there are degrees of causal contribution. Tony honore oxford university press it is a civil wrong to cause injury to another by negligence in driving a vehicle, but the claim is barred or reduced if the negligent conduct of the person injured is also a cause of the injury. Secondly, even if the criteria suggested for selecting caudation conditions as causes are in place in explanatory inquiries they are not. Causation in the law herbert lionel adolphus hart, tony. Aug 14, 2019 hart honore causation in the law pdf causation in the law. Hart1, hailed as the most important decision in the realm of medical negligence since rogers v.
It may, of course, well be that when we thoroughly understand the commonsense notions of causation we should no longer wish our thought on any matters, let alone legal judgments of responsibility, to be dominated by them. Hart and honore, in their famous work causation in the law, also tackle the problem of too many causes. An updated and extended second edition supporting the findings of its wellknown predecessor which claimed that courts employ commonsense notions of causatio. Influenced by such usage, hart and honore asserted that both the question of historical contribution and the question of truncation of responsibility were causal questions. And it basically states that an offence pinned on someone cannot be successful if the action of the accused did not directly cause that death or grievous bo. In addition, the author expertly applies causation questions in concrete scenarios, and ultimately, this book provides a single volume solution to a very complex but essential question of insurance law and tort law. This is elevated into a cause where it is a deliberate human intervention, or.
Hart honore causation in the law pdf pdf encyclopedia. How might moral responsibility and legal responsibility come apart, even in a just legal. Novus actus interveniens in medical cases and the egg shell skull rule are considered with case summaries. Read the fulltext online edition of causation in the law 1959. Causation in insurance contract law also comes with a. Professors hart and honore responded with a warning against a general elimina. Introduction the long awaited high court decision of chappel v. Hart and tony honore abstract this text is an updated and extended second edition supporting the findings of its wellknown predecessor which claimed that courts employ commonsense notions of causation in determining legal responsibility. Causation in criminal law is concerned with whether the defendants conduct contributed sufficiently to the prohibited consequence to justify the criminal liability, which would be assessed from two aspects, namely factual and legal causation. Herbert lionel adolphus, 1907publication date 1962 topics proximate cause law publisher oxford. The problem with the common sense test of causation elise neilson ba qld, llb student, tc beirne school of law, the university of queensland i. An updated and extended second edition supporting the findings of its wellknown predecessor which claimed that courts employ commonsense notions of.
1125 975 193 420 770 1083 621 433 1082 1305 1346 1252 959 1519 124 348 1396 82 126 396 644 1074 821 1484 1184 1497 237 199 906 1085 242 594 1271 1403 355 228 28 9 1158 41 1099 1253